What should judges do for players that are consistently late to rounds?

Judges, as part of their role in maintaining the integrity and smooth operation of the tournament, must take appropriate action when players are consistently late to rounds. Issuing warnings or penalties is essential to address the behavior and ensure that the tournament runs on schedule. The frequency and impact of the lateness play a significant role in determining the appropriate response.

By starting with a warning, judges can inform players of the consequences of their actions, emphasizing the importance of punctuality in a tournament setting. If the behavior persists, judges may escalate to penalties, which can help deter future lateness and foster a more respectful environment for all participants. This approach not only addresses the immediate issue but also contributes to the overall discipline and adherence to tournament rules.

In contrast, ignoring lateness could lead to more significant disruptions as the tournament progresses. Allowing a grace period without any consequences does not send a clear message about the importance of being on time. Removing players outright could be too severe, especially if it is possible for judges to reasonably address the situation through warnings or penalties first. Therefore, taking a measured approach that focuses on education and accountability is the most effective strategy for judges.